nov , isolated from sewage Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011, 61:18

nov., isolated from sewage. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011, 61:1895–1901.CrossRef 27. De Smet S, De Zutter L, Debruyne L, Vangroenweghe F, Vandamme P, Houf K: Arcobacter population dynamics in pigs on farrow-to-finish farms. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77:1732–1738.PubMedCrossRef 28. De Smet S, De Zutter L, Houf K: Small ruminants as carriers of the emerging

foodborne pathogen Arcobacter on small and medium farms. Small Ruminants Res 2011, 97:124–129.CrossRef Competing interests The authors declared that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions AL carried out the experiments, the literature review, and was the principal author of the manuscript. MJF designed the research project, evaluated results, helped draft the manuscript, and supervised AL. Both authors read and approved the final Selleckchem ZD1839 manuscript.”
“Background Recurrence of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus subtype H7 in humans and poultry continues to be a serious concern to public health. Before 2002, only occasional case reports of human H7 influenza virus infections occurred as a result of direct animal-to-human transmission or laboratory accidents

and most of these infections resulted in conjunctivitis and/or mild influenza-like illness [1]. In 2003, an HPAI H7N7 outbreak buy PR-171 in the Netherlands infected 89 people who were in close contact with affected poultry, including one fatal case, and led to the culling of over 30 million birds [2]. The most recent outbreak of H7N9 strains in China resulted in more than 130 human cases, including 36 deaths, making H7 subtype HPAI viruses the focus of public attention [3]. WHO

has listed HPAI H7N9 as one of the most lethal viral pathogens [4]. Most of the infected patients had a history of poultry contact, indicating the transmission from poultry to human. The scale of poultry outbreaks and its association with cases of human infection P-type ATPase with H7 viruses highlights the need for efficient diagnosis and continued surveillance of this virus subtype [5]. Conventional laboratory methods for influenza virus detection include virus isolation in embryonated eggs or Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, followed by subsequent HA subtype identification using serological methods. Molecular detection methods such as real-time PCR assays have been OSI-906 research buy widely applied for the laboratory diagnosis of influenza infections [6, 7] and HA subtype identification [8]. However, both conventional and laboratory methods are technically demanding and are not suitable for on-site use in field investigations. The development of rapid H7 subtype influenza virus detection tests in dot ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) [9], AC-ELISA (antigen-capture ELISA), and chromatographic strip formats [10] using H7 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) is hence preferred.

Comments are closed.