Although success can be expected in greater than 90% of these surgical patients, the optimal postoperative sedation management remains challenging.”
“An SIS epidemic model in two competing species with the mass action
incidence is formulated and analysed. Thresholds for the existence of boundary equilibria are identified and conditions for their local asymptotic stability or instability are found. By persistence theory, conditions for the persistence of either CFTRinh 172 hosts or pathogens are proved. Using Hopf bifurcation theory and numerical simulations, some aspects of the complicated dynamic behaviours of the model are shown: the system may have zero up to three internal equilibria, may have a stable limit cycle, may have three stable attractors. Through the results on persistence and stability of the boundary equilibria, some important interactions IPI-145 concentration between infection and competition are revealed: (1) a species that would become extinct without the infection, may persist in presence of the infection; (2) a species that would coexist with its competitor without the infection, is driven to extinction by the infection; (3) an infection that would die out in either species without the interinfection of disease, may persist in both species in presence of this factor. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
This study aimed to compare hostility, impulsivity, and behavior inhibition between women with and without premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) during both luteal and follicular phases and to examine whether these variables contribute to irritability and daily functional impairment of PMDD.\n\nMethods: PMDD was screened via the Premenstrual Symptoms Screening Tool. A diagnosis of PMDD was confirmed by psychiatric interviewing without 2-month prospective confirmation. Sixty FLT3 inhibitor women in the PMDD group and 60 women in the control group completed the Chinese Version of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory-Short Form, Dickman’s Impulsivity
Inventory, and the Behavior Inhibition System Scale during the luteal and follicular phases.\n\nResults: We found that the PMDD group had significantly higher levels of hostility, dysfunctional impulsivity, and behavioral inhibition than the control group in both luteal and follicular phases. The PMDD group also had more premenstrual aggravation on total hostility, hostility affect, and suppressive hostility than the control group. Higher hostility, dysfunctional impulsivity, and behavior inhibition were associated with more severe irritability and functional impairment of PMDD.\n\nDiscussion: Hostility, impulsivity, and behavior inhibition might contribute to irritability and functional impairment in women with PMDD.\n\nConclusion: Assessment and interventions based on these factors should be provided for women with PMDD, especially in the luteal phase.