As seen in Table 2, a number of variables from across the three different Temsirolimus 162635-04-3 clusters significantly predicted making a 24-hr quit attempt when examined in isolation (i.e., Model 1). However, only select variables remained significant when entered into regression model in conjunction with other significant variables from within respective predictor cluster (i.e., Model 2) and across clusters (i.e., Model 3). Overall, the results suggest that being in a relationship, lower level of education, greater readiness to quit in next 6 months, higher self-efficacy, and greater number of prior quit attempts are strongly associated with making a 24-hr quit attempt. Table 2. Unadjusted and Adjusted Odds ratios, 95% CI, and p Value for 24-hr Quit Attempt (N = 849)a Abstinence We first examined predictors of abstinence exclusively among those who made a quit attempt (i.
e., 145 abstainers/376 attempters). As seen in Table 3, Model 3, significant predictors across the three models were temptation and higher self-efficacy. Table 3. Unadjusted and Adjusted Odds Ratios, 95% CI, and p Value for 7-day Abstinence Among Prior Any Self-defined Quit Attempters (N = 376)a Next, we examined predictors of 7-day abstinence among the entire study sample (i.e., regardless of whether they reported a previous quit attempt). Seventeen percent (n = 145) of the sample reported achieving a period of 7-day abstinence at any point during the study period. As seen in Table 4, Model 3, the variables that remained consistently significantly predictive of 7-day abstinence included older age, lower level of education, readiness to quit in next 6 months, higher self-efficacy, and lower levels of nicotine dependence.
Table 4. Unadjusted and Adjusted Odds Ratios, 95% CI, and p Value for 7-day Abstinence (N = 849)a Discussion Unlike existing studies, we examined predictors of quit attempts and 7-day point prevalence abstinence among a sample of smokers not currently interested in quitting exclusively, who constitute the majority of smokers (Wewers et al., 2003). In addition to the sample, our study was unique in terms of its novel analytic approach, including the use of multiple definitions of quit attempts and multiple analyses to examine the separate steps of making quit attempts and succeeding in quitting, as well as the aggregate process of both.
Anacetrapib We examined (a) bivariate predictors of each outcome as well as (b) predictors within clusters of demographic, motivational, and smoking history and (c) predictors across these same clusters. Throughout this discussion, we focus on the latter, since this is the most clinically meaningful area of interpretation. In general, our broad findings are very much similar with other research among general populations of smokers (Vangeli et al., 2011).