Blood for non-invasive markers was drawn on same day as of liver

Blood for non-invasive markers was drawn on same day as of liver biopsy. Ishak stage was used to grade fibrosis histologically. Spearman’s correlation was used to compare non-invasive markers

with Ishak stage. Each non-invasive marker was also evaluated by ROC curve to predict significant fibrosis(IS >2). Youden’s ACP-196 index was used to find out best cut-off value of each score in predicting significant fibrosis. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were calculated for each score. Results: 80%(96/120) enrolled patients had viral etiology and 20% had autoimmune, alcohol, or NASH etiology.Their mean age was 36.7±12.5 years and 78.3% were males. The median ISHAK stage was 2(range 0-6)and 45% patients had significant fibrosis(IS >2). All Sirolimus datasheet non-invasive scores showed significant correlation with Ishak stages(Table-1). The highestaccuracy to predict significant fibrosis(IS >2)was obtained by King score[sensitivity=77.8%;specificity=78.8%;area under receiver operating characteristic(AUROC)=0.84](Table-1). Conclusion: Among various non-invasive markers available to predict liver fibrosis, king score[age(yrs)xAST(U/L)xlNR/Platelets(per nL)]showed the highest accuracy(78.3%)but not good enough to replace liver biopsy

clinically. However, these markers can be used in combinations to identify the hepatic fibrosis patient, when liver biopsy is not feasible or available, until a better marker is identified. Our study shows that the currently available from non-invasive markers can be useful in predicting hepatic fibrosis in certain clinical scenarios but due to lack of enough diagnostic accuracy cannot replace gold standard liver biopsy yet. Disclosures: Ashish Kumar – Consulting: Abbott India

Limited, Ranbaxy India Limited The following people have nothing to disclose: Vipin Verma, Shiv K. Sarin, Ravi Kant, Archana Rastogi, Chhagan Bihari Background/Aims: Steatosis may facilitate the progression of several chronic liver diseases that can result in fibrosis and cirrhosis. Until now, the most practically used non-invasive means of detecting steatosis is ultrasonography (US), although it can only detect steatosis of greater than 30%. Recently, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) being implemented on FibroScan(®) (Echosens, Paris, France), can evaluate both steatosis and fibrosis simultaneously, and is reported to be efficient in detecting even low grade steatosis (>10% steatosis) noninvasively. We analyzed the CAP value in health checkup subjects and investigated the correlation between CAP value and US finding along with other clinical parameters. Methods: CAP results were retrospectively collected with other data including demographics, blood test results, and finding of abdominal ultrasonography from database of health checkup center. Steatosis grade was decided by cut-offs of CAP according to a previous report (Sasso M et al.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>