Cell viability assays Cell viability was determined using an MTT assay according to the manufacturer’s

protocol. pcDNA™6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR RG-7388 in vivo (mock) and anti-miR-inhibitors-Negative control (control) were used as the controls for miR-302b and anti-miR-302b, respectively. The absorbance of each well was measured using a multidetection microplate reader (BMG LABTECH, Durham, NC, USA) at a wavelength of 570 nm. All experiments were performed in quadruplicate. Cell apoptosis assays Cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in 500 μL binding buffer containing 2.5 μL annexin V-phycoerythrin (PE) and 5 μL 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) to determine the phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure on the outer plasma membrane. After incubation, the samples were MK5108 chemical structure analyzed using flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). The experiment was repeated three times. Cell invasion assay Cell selleck compound invasion was measured using transwell chambers (Millipore,

Billerica, USA) coated with Matrigel. After transfection, the harvested cells were suspended in serum free RPMI 1640 and were added into the upper compartment of the chamber; conditioned RPMI 1640 medium with 20% (v/v) FBS was used as a chemoattractant and placed in the bottom compartment of the chamber. After incubation, the cells were removed from the upper surface of the filter with a cotton swab. The invaded cells were then fixed and stained using 0.1% crystal violet. The cells were quantified from five different fields under a light microscope. The experiment was repeated in triplicate. Statistical analysis To investigate the association of miR-302b expression with clinicopathological features and survival, miR-302b expression values were separated into low and high expression groups using the median expression value within the cohort as a cutoff. A Fisher’s exact

text was used to analyze the relationship between miR-302b and the various clinicopathological characteristics. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the first day of treatment to the time of disease progression. The survival curves were built according to the Kaplan-Meier method, and the resulting curves were compared using the log-rank test. The joint effect of covariables was examined using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. For other analyses, PAK6 the data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences between groups were assessed using an unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test; P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Expression of miR-302b in ESCC and its significance We examined the expression of miR-302b in a set of 50 paired samples using qRT-PCR. The results showed that miR-302b was significantly down-regulated in ESCC tissues when compared to the NAT (20 ± 3.42 vs 40 ± 5.24, P < 0.05, Figure 1A). Next, the correlation of miR-302b with the clinicopathological factors was examined.