Exhaustive subdivision required that all individuals be classifie

Exhaustive subdivision required that all individuals be classified into phylogenetic species and no individuals be left unclassified. The technique involved tracing from the terminal nodes of the tree, collapsing all lineages that were not subtended by an independent evolutionary lineage (Dettman et al. 2006; Laurence et al. 2014). Testing phylogenetic informativeness To determine loci most suitable for species level phylogenetic inference in closely related

species within Diaporthe, we employed the phylogenetic SRT2104 mw informativeness profiling method (Townsend 2007) implemented in PhyDesign (Lopez-Giraldez and Townsend 2011, http://phydesign.townsend.yale.edu/). Phylogenetic informativeness (PI) was measured from a partitioned combined dataset of ten ex-types and taxonomically authenticated species for the ITS, EF1-α, TUB, CAL, ACT, HIS, FG1093 and Apn2 genes. The maximum likelihood tree from RAxML analysis of the concatenated data set was ultrametricised

using Mesquite (Maddison and Maddison 2011). Per gene and per site informativeness for all partitions were determined using PhyDesign and the rates of change for each site determined under the HyPhy criteria (Pond et al. 2005). Results DNA Sequencing, Apn2 new primers and phylogenetic analyses Four hundred new sequences were generated in this study (Table 1) from 68 living cultures of Diaporthe for eight genes (ACT, Apn2, CAL, EF1-α, HIS, FG1093, ITS and selleck chemical TUB). Additional sequences were obtained from GenBank. Evaluation of the newly designed Apn2 primers (apnfw2/apanrw2) determined that the melting temperatures (Tm) of apn2fw2 = 49–56 °C and apn2rw2 = 58.6 °C with GC content of apn2fw2 = 38–57 % and apn2rw2 = 59 %. No hairpin formation or self-complementarities were found. The optimal annealing temperature for the primer pair was determined to be 54 °C by the by gradient PCR using amplification conditions outlined in materials and methods. Amplification and sequencing of 20 different isolates of Diaporthe outside of the D. eres species

PI-1840 LY3023414 chemical structure complex (GenBank accessions KM016673-KM016694) including additional isolates of Ophiodiaporthe cyatheae (AR5192, KM016693) and Mazzantia galii (AR4658, KM016692) were successful (Supplementary material 1/ESM 1). Eight different alignments corresponding to each individual gene, a combined alignment of all eight genes, and a combined alignment of the seven genes excluding the ITS were analysed. Comparison of the alignment properties and nucleotide substitution models are provided in Table 2. Phylogenetic trees inferred from EF1-α and ITS sequences for all isolates, a summary of the results of GCPSR in RAxML cladogram and a phylogram of combined analysis of seven genes are presented with annotations for species, host and geographic origin (Figs. 1, 2, 3).

Comments are closed.