Here, b is the y-intercept and m is the slope. To study the effects of time-on-task and task difficulty on microsaccades, we analysed the slopes of the linear fits of the data from the peak velocity–magnitude relationship slope per block (Di Stasi et al., 2013a,b). Microsaccade rates,

microsaccade magnitudes and peak velocity–magnitude relationship slopes met the assumption of normality (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, all P-values > 0.05). For each of these variables we performed a 2 × 6 repeated-measures anova with the experimental condition (Easy vs. Difficult) and time-on-task Seliciclib (blocks 1–6) as the within-subjects factors. Microsaccade directions, number of fixation breaks, and blink rates were not normally distributed, so we used non-parametric analyses for these variables

(Friedman’s test and Wilcoxon’s matched paired tests). We determined the effect of task difficulty during mental arithmetic on microsaccade dynamics. Participants performed one Control task (fixation only) and two types of mental arithmetic tasks (Easy and Difficult) over six consecutive time blocks, during a single experimental session. Task performance and subjective ratings are commonly used to assess task difficulty (Di Stasi et al., 2013a,b; Gao et al., 2013). Here, both task performance (Fig. 3) and subjective ratings (Table 1) data indicated a successful manipulation of task difficulty. The Difficult task generated less correct answers and lower numbers of mental calculation http://www.selleckchem.com/products/bmn-673.html steps than the Easy task (Fig. 3), and the Difficult task led to higher levels of perceived difficulty (F1,8 = 19.40, 3-oxoacyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) reductase P < 0.001; MSE = 1.98) and lower levels of happiness (F1,8 = 6.75, P < 0.05; MSE = 2.41) than the Easy task (Table 1). Time-on-task affected the number of mental calculation steps. The number of mental calculation steps increased linearly with time-on-task in both mental arithmetic conditions, indicating an improvement in performance throughout the session (Fig. 3, right panel), presumably due to practice. Time-on-task did not affect subjective ratings (all F-values < 3; Table 2). Microsaccade rate was lower for the Difficult task than

for the Easy task (Figs 4A and S1; Table 1), and increased linearly with time-on-task in both conditions. There was no significant interaction between task difficulty and time-on-task (Fig. 4A; Table 2). Microsaccade rates in the Control (i.e. fixation only) condition were consistent with those reported in previous research (Martinez-Conde et al., 2009, 2013). Microsaccade magnitude was higher for the Difficult task than for the Easy task (Fig. 4B; Table 1), and did not change with time-on-task in either condition. There was no significant interaction between task difficulty and time-on-task (Fig. 4B inset; Table 2). Microsaccade magnitudes in the Control (i.e. fixation only) condition were consistent with those reported in previous studies (Martinez-Conde et al., 2009, 2013).