“
“Objective: To evaluate the outcome of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid surgery without skin thinning, a test group with direct implantation without such thinning was compared with a control group that underwent the traditional procedure.

Study Design: This was a single-center, prospective clinical trial designed to evaluate a novel approach to Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid implantation.

Eligible patients were enrolled consecutively in the test group or selected to be age-matched controls.

Setting: University Hospital.

Patients: Eighteen adult patients, suffering from hearing loss, suitable for implantable hearing aid.

Methods: Single-step surgery was performed on 18 patients CP-690550 under local anesthesia. In 9 of these, a linear incision was made, a hole was punched through the skin above the bone-anchored implant, and a longer abutment (8.5-12 mm) was introduced, whereas the other 9 were subjected to the standard protocol, using a dermatome and ML323 mw skin thinning. All of the patients were followed for 12 months.

Results: The test group exhibited good preservation of the tissue, no increasing skin reactions and no adverse events. The time required for this surgery was reduced, as was their healing time. These patients also experienced less numbness and

pain in the surrounding area and had an improved cosmetic outcome.

Main Outcome and Conclusion: This clinical trial indicates that introduction of the abutment to the osseointegrated screw directly THZ1 in vivo through the skin, without skin thinning, could be beneficial. This approach had fewer negative effects than the conventional procedure during the 12- month follow-up period.”
“Aims: Neurogenic bladder can be effectively managed with intermittent catheterization (IC) to improve or restore continence, but there is no consensus on which type of catheter

is preferred. Hydrophilic catheters were developed to reduce urethral friction, thereby minimizing trauma and sticking, and making them more acceptable to the patient, and easier and safer to use. The objective of this article was to review the literature on the benefits of hydrophilic catheters in patients with neurogenic bladder. Methods: A large body of experimental and observational evidence, including randomized controlled trials, was identified using PubMed. Results: Compared with plastic catheters that have been manually lubricated with gel, hydrophilic catheters reduce urinary tract infection and microhematuria. Hydrophilic catheters are also associated with high levels of patient satisfaction because they are comfortable to use. Conclusions: There is a wealth of evidence, including randomized controlled trials, to support the benefits of hydrophilic catheters in terms of safety and quality of life, especially in men with spinal cord injury. More data are required for spina bifida, multiple sclerosis, and in women.