The two formulations F1 and F2 with their respective

The two formulations F1 and F2 with their respective Trametinib solubility dmso PEG 400: T-80 ratios 8/8% and 8/6% (w/v), respectively, had the proficiency of yielding smaller particle size or nanoparticles of the drug. This may have occurred due to the possible arrest of growth of nucleating crystals by the mentioned surfactant T-80 or polymer PEG 400 through steric or electrostatic mechanism [21]. On the other hand, formulations F3, F4 and F5 with respective PEG 400: T-80 ratios 8/2%, 8/1%, 8/0.05% (w/v) showed significantly higher particle size along with increased PDI ( Table 1). The transmission electron microscopic morphological

observation obtained for the formulation F5 revealed the higher particle size of the drug in formulation ( Fig. 3b). The aggregation seen in formulations (F3 to F5) as a function of decreased concentration of T-80 resulted in the increased particle size and PDI which implies that maintenance of T-80 at 6% (w/v) is the minimum necessary requirement [16], to maintain its steric inhibitory effect on the formation of larger particles ( Fig. 2). Other possible mechanism that can be proposed in this context is the existence of PM181104 as a non-ionized solute having better solubility behavior in non-ionic surfactant. As per our observation the effect of non-ionic surfactant concentration on the particle size of the drug and subsequent solubility is in contrast with the experimental observations made by [11]. In

parallel studies, with reference to determining the effect of reduced selleck chemical concentration of PEG 400, a set of three formulations F6, F7 and F8 with their stiochiometric ratios of T-80: PEG 400 at 8/6,8/1,8/0.5% (w/v) were prepared to check for particle size and solubility of the drug. Surprisingly, the particle size and PDI for all these formulations were significantly small (around 50 nm)

and Branched chain aminotransferase they were almost comparable to the values obtained for F1 and F2 (Table 2). The absence of any precipitation or aggregation even at decreased concentration of PEG 400 indicates that the PEG 400 concentration has no effect what so ever on the particle size and solubility of the drug. This implies that T-80 has an influencing effect on nanoparticle generation due to its high molecular mass (1310 g mol−1), almost equivalent to that of PM181104 (1514 g mol−1). Where as PEG 400 is a low molecular mass (380–420 g mol−1) molecule (Fig. 2). This difference in the molecular mass appears to be having a steric effect on the nanoparticle size and solubility as they have differential effect of adsorption rate on the particle surface which may be a controlling factor in the formulation of nanoparticles [22]. Physical appearances of the formulated solutions are shown in Fig. 3a. The solutions in the first two glass vials are clear and colorless formulations followed by semi-transparent formulations and then a set of clear and colorless stock of formulations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>