Their study, carried out in a healthcare setting, demonstrated that organizational support moderated Sirolimus the effects of physical violence, vicariously experienced violence, psychological assault on emotional well-being, somatic health and job-related affect. Cole et al. (1997) showed that reduced supervisory

support was associated with harassment, threats and fear of violence in the workplace. Our study points to the fact that employer support of employees is likely to be crucial to their recovery from a workplace violence event in a large variety of professions. Past research has often concentrated on one type of occupation, for instance in the healthcare sector (Gates 2004). Our study has implications for the prevention of consequences of workplace violence by such interested parties as employers, occupational health and healthcare providers as well as victims’ services organizations. Based on our findings, the psychological distress of victims shortly after a violent event, even in the absence of serious physical

injuries, should not be underestimated and victims should be advised selleck screening library to seek professional help. Moreover, the importance of support from employers for the recovery of workplace violence victims needs to be emphasized. In the qualitative section of our study (De Puy et al. 2012), respondents gave examples of forms of support from employers that had been particularly helpful.

This included moral support and follow-up (a phone call, a letter, or a visit to the hospital), assisting the victim in order to obtain medical care, legal and administrative Clomifene advice (filing a complaint, or getting insurance benefits), and organizational measures to prevent future incidents (hiring security guards, improving protective procedures, banning the perpetrator from the premises or check details signaling the perpetrator to the staff). In contrast, interviewees who had not received any of these forms of support or had experienced the employer’s response as inadequate (e.g., victim blaming, being dismissed) expressed strong feelings of disappointment and distress. We found that first-time victimization appears as a risk factor for more severe consequences in occupations with high risk and awareness of violence. This unexpected result would need to be verified in further studies with larger samples. However, it is possible that successful recovery and subsequent return to work after the violent encounter is the key factor rather than the number of times a violent incident is experienced. The limitations of our study are inherent to the clinical nature of our population. The size of our sample was determined by the number of people who came to the consultation between 2007 and 2010 following a workplace violence event.