Thus, other initiation factors besides eIF4G might also selleck E7080 be more critically involved in removing secondary structures in advance of the scanning PIC. This view is supported by Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries the fact that in a mammalian reconstituted system, eIF4G, eIF4A and eIF4B are sufficient Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries for 43S attachment and scanning on b globin mRNA, which har bors a relatively unstructured 5UTR, whereas the DExH box protein DHX29 is required for initiation complex ly on mRNAs containing more structured 5UTRs. Similarly, there is evidence that yeast DEAD box pro tein Ded1 contributes more than eIF4A does to the pro cessivity of scanning in vivo. These findings are in agreement with the possibility that the eIF4E eIF4G eIF4A complex is more critical for 43S PIC attachment near the 5 end of the mRNA than for subse quent scanning to the start codon.

Thus, our results are consistent with the model that 43S attachment is a rate limiting step for a large propor tion of mRNAs with higher than average TEs, and that this step is stimulated by eIF4G, particularly for the 100 genes we identified with the greatest dependence on eIF4G that Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries contain relatively short 5UTRs. By con trast, scanning or AUG recognition would be rate limit ing for mRNAs with longer than average 5UTRs whose translation is enhanced by depletion of eIF4G, because these steps are not critically dependent on eIF4G. The fact that eliminating eIF4G mitigates the lower than average translational efficiencies of this second group of mRNAs can be explained by proposing that the negative effect of depleting eIF4G on 43S attachment is out weighed by their enhanced ability to compete with other mRNAs for limiting factors that Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries promote scanning or AUG recognition.

Fulfilling this last stipulation Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries of our model would be facilitated if the inefficient buy Trichostatin A mRNAs with long 5UTRs are relatively ineffective at exploiting eIF4G function in 43S attachment. That is, if eIF4G contributes relatively less to 43S attachment by these inefficient mRNAs in WT cells, then depleting eIF4G would produce relatively smaller reductions in their translation rate. One reason for thinking that this condition holds is our finding that this group of mRNAs also displays unusually long cod ing sequences, whereas the mRNAs we identified with the greatest dependence on eIF4G exhibit smaller than average ORF lengths. Recent findings by Jacobson et al indicate that shorter yeast mRNAs produce more stable eIF4F cap interactions than do longer mRNAs, which is fully dependent on an extended poly tail and PABP. Presumably, shorter mRNAs more efficiently assemble a closed loop mRNP via PABP eIF4G interac tion, which stabilizes eIF4F binding to mRNA.