We then considered different theoretical distributions for foci b

We then considered different theoretical distributions for foci between slices if excluded from increasing percentages (with 10% steps) of the cell periphery and/or the cell centre by subtracting circle areas (examples are shown in Figure 2, 3 and 4). Observed distributions

were compared to calculated distributions using the χ2 test http://​www.​graphpad.​com/​quickcalcs. Distributions were considered to be different if the associated p-values were less than 0.05. Pearson’s buy STA-9090 correlation coefficients between cell length and cell width distributions were calculated using Excel software. Acknowledgements We thank Thierry Enjalbert for preliminary constructs, and O. Espeli for the gift of plasmids and strains. We thank Roland Barriot and Hervé Seitz for help with the statistics, Philippe Guynet for help with mathematics; and Christian Lesterlin and Suckjoon Jun for helpful discussions. This work was funded by internal funding from the CNRS and University of Toulouse and by a grant from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR contract BLAN06-2 134012). https://www.selleckchem.com/products/nu7441.html Electronic

supplementary material Additional file 1: Additional figures. Figures S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5. (PDF 968 KB) References 1. Kellenberger E: Functional consequences of improved structural information on bacterial nucleoids. Res Microbiol 1991, 142 (2–3) : 229–238.PubMedCrossRef 2. Toro E, Shapiro L: Bacterial chromosome organization and segregation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010, 2 (2) : a000349.PubMedCrossRef 3. Reyes-Lamothe R, Wang X, Sherratt D: Escherichia coli and its chromosome. Trends Microbiol 2008, 16 (5) : 238–245.PubMedCrossRef 4. Reyes-Lamothe R, Possoz C, Danilova O, Sherratt D: Independent positioning and action of Escherichia coli replisomes in live cells. Cell 2008, 133 (1) : 90–102.PubMedCrossRef 5. Gordon G, Sitnikov D, Webb C, Teleman A, Straight A, Losick R, Murray A, p38 MAPK inhibitors clinical trials Wright A: Chromosome and low copy plasmid segregation in E. coli: visual evidence for distinct mechanisms. Cell 1997, 90 (6) : 1113–1121.PubMedCrossRef 6. Niki H, Yamaichi Y, Hiraga S: Dynamic

organization of chromosomal DNA in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev 2000, 14 (2) : 212–223.PubMed 7. Wang O-methylated flavonoid X, Liu X, Possoz C, Sherratt D: The two Escherichia coli chromosome arms locate to separate cell halves. Genes Dev 2006, 20 (13) : 1727–1731.PubMedCrossRef 8. Bates D, Kleckner N: Chromosome and replisome dynamics in E. coli: loss of sister cohesion triggers global chromosome movement and mediates chromosome segregation. Cell 2005, 121 (6) : 899–911.PubMedCrossRef 9. Espeli O, Mercier R, Boccard F: DNA dynamics vary according to macrodomain topography in the E. coli chromosome. Mol Microbiol 2008, 68 (6) : 1418–1427.PubMedCrossRef 10. Wang X, Possoz C, Sherratt D: Dancing around the divisome: asymmetric chromosome segregation in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev 2005, 19 (19) : 2367–2377.PubMedCrossRef 11.

Comments are closed.