0 The situation at home 0 0 43.3 30.0 26.7 Accommodations of my workplace or work tasks 1.7 1.7 53.3 26.7 16.7 In the course of the programme, the participants formulated a plan of action with one or more personal goals. These goals related to work-home interference (78%), feelings and thoughts about having a chronic disease (59%), communication at the workplace (44%), leisure time (33%), #Nirogacestat randurls[1|1|,|CHEM1|]# work accommodations (29%) or other topics (18%). One year after the start of the programme, 6 per cent felt that they had not reached the goal that they set
in the course of the programme, 38% reached it ‘a little,’ 36% reached it amply and 20% completely. Discussion and conclusion The recruitment for this intervention yielded enough participants but was time-consuming. We enrolled a sample in which higher-educated women working in the service sector are over-represented. The majority of the participants were satisfied with the programme, and only a few dropouts were noted. For the most part, the programme was administered as planned,
although some components took too much time. ‘Quality of work’ models and/or homework were not always discussed and not everybody had the opportunity to do role-playing as planned. The participants had no or only minor difficulties with understanding the materials discussed, but were more often emotionally upset, particularly when consequences of disease or feelings and thoughts were discussed, or during role-playing. Generally, the participants completed their homework, but when asked to organize a consultation Stattic research buy with their supervisor, many hesitated to do so; a minority did not complete this assignment.
Among those who completed these consultations, most considered it effective for problem solving. The perceived effectiveness Dapagliflozin of the training programme was highest in how it shaped participants’ personal attitudes and lowest in matters that are more practical. We have to be careful with conclusions based on the study process evaluation forms. The forms were completed by the trainers themselves and were likely correct as far as objective facts are concerned. The validity of some answers may be questionable, however, as trainers gave subjective judgments on whether the programme’s components were tailored to the participants. Furthermore, they give an overall response for the whole group, rather than individuals. However, the forms are of special value when the three trainers showed consensus on less positive aspects or when they noted barriers. For instance, there was consensus on the lack of time for some components, all three observed that some components are likely to raise emotional difficulties and all noted that consultations with the supervisor are often met with resistance. Another weakness of this study is that we do not know what proportion of the target group was reached. We did not approach a known group of employees with chronic diseases.