In this article, we discuss the management of SDB in pediatric pa

In this article, we discuss the management of SDB in pediatric patients, which relies on the accurate assessment of symptoms of SDB, identification of comorbidities known to increase the severity of SDB, and appropriate preoperative assessment of the patient. The approach to patients with snoring and other signs of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) GSK690693 mw represents a common management challenge for the pediatrician, pulmonologist, anesthesiologist, and otolaryngologist. From the assessment of the historical symptoms of SDB to the consideration of comorbid conditions and the evaluation for potential anatomic sources for obstruction, the evaluation of patients with SDB

can be complex and confusing, with the decision for and timing of subsequent intervention(s) unclear. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery published “Clinical Practice Guideline: Polysomnography for Sleep-Disordered Breathing Prior to Tonsillectomy in Children” in 2011 to elucidate the approach to this patient population. 1 In the production of this clinical practice guideline (CPG), a panel of experts from the fields of anesthesiology, otolaryngology-head and neck surgery,

pediatrics, pulmonology, and sleep medicine was assembled to review the indications for and proper use of polysomnography (PSG) in the management of children with SDB. Their recommendations, which will be discussed in detail, are outlined in Table 1. [Graphics] .”
“Although LY2157299 it has been suggested that switching of factor VIII (FVIII) products

may increase inhibitor formation this is disputed. Half of UK patients changed rFVIII Selonsertib cell line brands because of national contracting in 2010, presenting an opportunity to compare inhibitor incidence of switchers with non-switchers. Centres were requested to test all the patients for inhibitors prior to the switching date and 6-monthly thereafter. Positive and negative inhibitor test data were also collected to analyse for testing bias. A total of 1198 patients with severe haemophilia A and treated with Advate, Kogenate/Helixate or Refacto AF preswitch were included in the analysis, of whom 516 switched to Refacto-AF and 682 did not switch products. Five new inhibitors were reported amongst previously treated patients ( bigger than 50 exposure days) with a median titre at the time of detection of 1.25BUmL(-1) (IQR 0.7-23.05). One inhibitor occurred in a non-switcher using Kogenate, an incidence of 1.5 per 1000 treatment-years (95% CI 0.2-10.5). Four inhibitors arose in patients who had switched from Kogenate (two) or Advate (two) to ReFacto-AF, an incidence of 7.8 per 1000 treatment-years (95% CI 2.9-20.8). These incidence rates did not differ significantly from one another (incidence rate ratio 5.3 (95% CI 0.5-260.3) or from the historical rate of 6.05 inhibitors/1000 treatment-years (95% CI 5.18-7.06). Only one inhibitor (non-switcher) persisted. Non-switchers were significantly older (P= 0.

Comments are closed.